Editor choice

Air Fryer Roundup: Phillips HD9220 vs HD9240

Philips HD9220 vs. Philips HD9240How to choose an air fryer for quick, easy, and delicious meals.

Frying foods is difficult. It’s a lengthy, time-consuming process, and one that is easy to mess up.

Don’t fret, though—modern technology is here to help. Automatic air fryers have been on the market for quite some time now, and people swear by them.

Not only do they make cooking fried foods easier, but they make clean-up and preparations more straightforward as well. In short, if you love to make fried dishes but hate the headaches that come with doing so, you need an air fryer.

But how do you choose? There are tons of different options, each with unique features and benefits. It’s an intimidating prospect, without question.

But it isn’t as stressful a choice as you might think. There are two frontrunners in the space that handily outclass the competition. Better still, a single company makes both. The Philips HD9220 and the Philips HD9240 are peerless in their quality, features, and speed.

Now that we’ve narrowed the choice down to two options, there is only one thing left to do: we need to decide, once and for all, which is the better of the two fryers.

Let’s get started.

Top pick
Philips HD9240

  • Patented Starfish Design
  • Digital Touchscreen Interface
  • 60 Minute Timer
  • Adjustable Temperature up to 390 degrees

Check now

We’ve tested 2 Philips airfryers and the winner is above!

Phillips HD9220 vs Phillips 9240

While they share a manufacturer, there are plenty of differences between the HD9240 and the HD9220. Generally, they intend to service two demographics.

The Philips HD9240 is a more heavy-duty and versatile package that has a lot to offer for food-frying aficionados. Conversely, the HD9220 will be better for entry and mid-level chefs. It is also the preferable option for those who have never tried an air fryer.

Philips HD9220 vs. Philips HD9240

What do these differences mean concerning specifications? Power consumption, noise output, and storage space are the areas affected the most. The HD9240 is larger, uses much more power, and includes more storage space for ingredients.

This extra space translates to you being able to fry more foods at a faster rate. It’s also much noisier, however, and if energy-saving capabilities are essential to you, its power rating of 1750 W (Watts) may be off-putting.

The Philips HD9220 is smaller and consumes far less power — only 1425 W. If you plan on using this air fryer very frequently, the difference on your next power bill will be tangible, so this isn’t an irrelevant talking point.

As you may have guessed, it is also much smaller, and therefore incapable of holding the same amount of ingredients as its larger counterpart. The experience is much slower as a result. Likewise, it is also significantly quieter.

Differences are crucial, but similarities are as well — they can help you keep track of the capabilities you deem vital for a satisfactory frying experience. So what are the commonalities between the two Philips devices?

Both feature Philip’s proprietary automatic shut-off and “Cool Wall Exterior” technologies.

The former has the device powering off the minute your food is finished frying, while the latter allows the outside of the air fryer to remain at room temperature, ensuring safe handling and preventing heat-related mishaps.

Both are useful and welcome functions for an air fryer to include. They are also where the similarities between the two air fryers end.

The rest of these fryer’s functions are unique to a respective model and will be elaborated upon in greater detail in the coming sections.

Philips HD9240 vs HD9220 Comparison Chart


Philips HD9220

Philips HD9240


Philips HD9220

Philips HD9240


1.8lb/2.5qt (1 bag of French fries)

2.65lb/3.5qt (2 bags of French fries)


1425 W

1750 W


120 V

120 V


30 Min

60 Min


Analog Display

Digital Touchscreen Display

Automatic Shut




287 x 315 x 384 mm

315 x 302 x 425 mm


16.36 lbs

15.4 lbs

Check on Amazon

Check on Amazon

Product Comparison


With the Philips HD9220, the first feature of note is its “Rapid Air” technology. Philips claims that this feature allows you to make restaurant-quality dishes with only a tablespoon, potentially even less, of oil.

Additionally, the company says that this technology enables your fryer to bake, grill, and roast as well as it can fry. It also features a built-in 30-minute timer.

Phillips HD9220 features a built-in 30-minute timer

And to wrap things up, the HD9220 is entirely dishwasher safe. It’s not at all a bad set of capabilities, especially at its price point.

Next up, the HD9240. It sports an enhanced version of the previously mentioned “Rapid Air” technology. The difference here is that Philips says that the version included with the HD9240 is capable of producing healthier variants of your favorite fried foods.

Phillips HD9240 has the "Rapid Air" technology

As a bonus, the cooking process will also reduce the potency of the scents your fryer outputs.

The HD9240’s real draw is its onboard memory. This allows you to store your favorite recipes, cooking presets, temperature modes, and more in easily accessible user profiles. Without question, this is the feature that does the most to set the HD9240 apart from the HD9220.

Pairing these capabilities with its fantastic touchscreen interface, which is entirely digital, the HD9240 looks like a truly high-end and cutting edge air fryer.

Phillips HD9240 has a touchscreen interface

Features for both fryers are exceptional. If you have been looking for an air fryer that boasts stellar performance as well as a host of utility-focused features, then either of Philip’s options will suit you well. That said, the HD9240 is unquestionably the superior offering.

The HD9240’s superiority is by design. Within Philip’s “HD-X” line of air fryers, it is the next step up from the HD9220.

This is an essential factor to keep in mind for all of the following sections — Philips intends for the HD9240 to be more versatile, powerful, and feature-complete than the HD9220 in every aspect.

The question, then, boils down to whether or not the HD9240’s more luxurious package is something you need. It’s a subjective question, unfortunately.

And since its answer will be relevant to every section of the list, it will be answered by whether or not the bonuses included with the HD9240 feel like they justify its higher price.

In the case of its feature set, the answer is a resounding yes. The HD9240 is undoubtedly the better offering in this aspect.


The HD9220 goes for function over form. It lacks any sort of OSD (On-Screen Display). Instead, you control it with the timer on its front-facing side.

Just put the foods you want to fry into the device, set the timer for the correct time, and close the fryer. That’s all. Depending on your tastes, its simplicity is either a selling point or a drawback.

And that stands in stark contrast with the HD9240’s interface. As mentioned, this device uses an entirely digital OSD. It’s here where you will have access to the user profiles and various options listed in the features section.

Phillips HD9240 has a digital OSD

While it isn’t as simple and easy to use as the HD9220, the HD9240 ‘s interface is still very well designed. You can get where you need to go and access all essential features within seconds.

As a result, its complexity is far more of a selling point than a drawback, even for the most inexperienced chefs.

Seeing as user profiles—the HD9240’s most exciting feature — are inextricable from its interface, this is yet another win for the HD9240.


The Philips HD9220 is compact and easy to carry. It’s a great form factor for those who cook as a social activity, as it’s remarkably simple to move the device from one place to another. It’s also very lightweight, weighing only 17lbs.

Its design is similarly well executed. Opening the fryer is a snap, requiring only mild force after pushing the front-facing lever towards the base of the product. It’s fully closed once the lever returns to its original position — this will be followed by a satisfying “clack” sound.

There isn’t nearly as much to discuss concerning the product’s interior. It’s simply a reception area for whatever dish, platter, or rack you choose to keep ingredients from touching the HD9220’s floor.

Overall, the HD9220’s simple design is one of its greatest assets. Using it is wonderfully simple and intuitive.

Philips HD9220 vs. Philips HD9240

The HD9240 is similar yet more cumbersome. Surprisingly, it isn’t much larger than the Philips HD9220, weighing 18.3 lbs — just a single pound more than its counterpart. Utilization is where things get messy, however.

The product lacks the HD9220’s intuitive, self-contained form factor. Instead, the HD9240 is separated into two pieces — a removable food-reception area and the device itself.

The former is heavy and cumbersome, as well as more difficult to clean. Re-inserting the component is often fickle, as well. As a result, the HD9240 is a much less enjoyable product to use than its counterpart. The HD9220 wins by a mile.

Frying Speed

Frying capabilities may be the most critical quality for some buyers. Extra features are nice, and design is important, but results are what matter in the long run.

The HD9240 is undoubtedly the better offering here. Its superior power rating allows it to cook a broader range of dishes. In practice, this translates to what Philips calls “time control.” This number is how long the fryer can stay active without interruption.

With this in mind, the HD9240 is literally twice as efficient as the HD9220. It’s capable of sustaining cooking times of up to 60-minutes. Conversely, the HD9220 can only manage 30-minutes.

It’s an unfortunate side effect of the HD9240’s more liberal approach to power consumption, which is what the frying process requires to create more time-consuming dishes.

Because of this, the HD9240 takes yet another section of its more modest competition.

Power Consumption

Power consumption is crucial for any device. A device needs to pair two factors to have exceptional power consumption rates — efficiency and a high capacity.

Efficiency refers to how effective a device is at using the power it is being fed. If a product requires a lot of energy to perform a simple task, then it sorely lacks in efficiency. Capacity is more straightforward.

It refers to how much power a device is capable of accepting from a source. Likewise, it also determines how much energy a product requires to operate at any level.

Both the HD9220 and HD9240 are suitably efficient. Air fryers are traditionally power-hunger appliances, but both of these products buck that trend to some extent. They are also exactly the same in this regard — both devices deliver 120 V at 60 Hz.

They differ in capacity, as you may have guessed. The HD9240 has a 1750 W capacity, which is nearly 300 W greater than the HD9220. As a result, the HD9240 wins yet again.

The Overall Winner

The Philips HD9240. While the Philips HD9220 certainly has the better design, the HD9240 is the superior offering everywhere else. And in spite of its higher asking price, the features included with the HD9240 easily justify its price point.

Phillips HD9240

If you’re looking for the absolute best air fryer on the market, you should be looking at the Philips HD9240.


To wrap things up, here are some answers to common questions regarding air fryer’s usefulness, applications, and more.

How does air frying differ from standard frying?

To get the obvious out of the way — air fryers use air. Conventional frying devices use oil, which is packed with cholesterol, carbohydrates, and empty calories.

While air fryers still use a pinch of oil, they chiefly operate by circulating super-heated air within their hull. The result is a “crisping” effect that is identical to what you would find with standard deep fryers.

The benefits speak for themselves. Not only do you remove all the negative aspects of using oil as an ingredient, but you save money by not having to buy that oil as well. It’s a win-win situation.

Can air fryers do more than fry foods?

Yup. Because they generate large amounts of heat, the device’s interiors are typically suitable for other styles of cooking as well. These applications range from light saueteing to full-on grilling.

This broad range of uses make air fryers the Swiss Army knives of kitchen appliances.

Philips HD9240 Avance XL Digital Airfryer:

Are air fryers safer than conventional deep fryers?

Deep-frying devices use oil, as mentioned earlier. They also use open-hull designs, which means that once the oil gets to a high enough temperature, it begins to spit, spatter, and crackle — often violently and unpredictably.

This puts the chef at danger of burn-based injuries. Even more concerning is the fact that the oil can easily damage your eyes and skin irreparably.

No such dangers are present with air fryers. They use closed-hull designs, which prevents any oils from reaching your skin and body.

Air fryers also use so little oil that it’s hardly something worth concerning yourself with. In short, air fryers are much safer than conventional alternatives.


We will be happy to hear your thoughts

      Leave a reply